Share your bras and experiences and help other women
Get recommendations, write review and learn more!

Got bras? Create an account

Bra » Ewa Michalak » Sm Burek (430) » 65H » Bras » Owner

Measurements

Measurement Cm
Search by measurements
Fits ribcage0.0
B. perimeter0.0
Stretched Band74.0
Band Length59.0
Stretch ratio1.3
Cup width14.5
Cup depth29.5
Depth ratio2.0
Wire length29.5
Cup height0.0
Cup separation2.0
Gore height8.0
Wing height11.5
Strap width1.9
Hooks3
Compare to your bras

Labeled as

Index30:11
EU65H

Review

1
like

Didn't fit

I simply adore the HM, and quite frankly I was really gutted to hear that it would be replaced by the SM. I was very sceptical about the fit of the SM, it looked more like a balconette and not like a halfcup, and in general, balconettes just don’t work for me. They give me quadboob and a pointy shape.

The SM Burek, however, was so beautiful and the shape in the pictures looked better than that of the SM Trefl that I decided to give it a chance. Unfortunately, I was right in my doubts. The SM Burek doesn’t have a tight seam at the top of the cup, so I don’t exactly quadboob (just almost), but instead, the lace at the top flattens my breasts. This could be a good thing support-wise, but due to the construction of the cup, the result is a pair of pointy boobs with almost empty fabric at the tip of the cup. The cups just don’t work with my round breasts, and the shape is really not flattering – it’s pointy and doesn’t give the uplift I want but rather presses my breasts downwards. A huge letdown compared to the HM’s compact, upflifted and round shape https://d28qt14g3opchh.cloudfront.net/smileys/icon_sad.gif" alt=":(" />

Here's a comparison of the shape I get from the HM, which suits my shape naturally, and SM, which doesn’t: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/16490226/sm_vs_hm.png

The band is snug but not uncomfortably tight, I can fasten it on the loosest hooks as new and it would probably stretch pretty soon. The cups are true to size, I think. The straps are broad, soft and not very stretchy, so probably very comfortable. The wires are narrower than in the HM, which isn’t a problem for me, rather the contrary.

So all in all, it’s a superbly beautiful bra and technically it’s an okay fit for me. However, the shape is such a turnoff for me that I’ll be listing this straight away – I know I won’t be using it anyway.

Baaww, I miss the HM https://d28qt14g3opchh.cloudfront.net/smileys/icon_sad.gif" alt=":(" />

This bra is not owned any more

Updated on Jul 30, 2013 Flag this


Subscribe to updates on this entry


add a comment

Use @ to mention users, brands, models and more

You need to sign in to comment