Feb 06, 2014
I am confused. Can anyone explain to me why unlined bras have a depth that is usually at least an inch deeper than lined bras in the same size? For example, I have Cleo Jude in 28E which averages at 5.2" wide and 7.5" deep (similar to most of the lined/moulded Cleos I've looked at), but then Cleo Marcie (and most unlined) have an average wire width of 5.0" and depth of 8.3" in 28E. Is there a reason why unlined seem so much deeper? Does it affect fit? Any info and explanations would be appreciated!!
Filed under Bra sizing and fit
3 comments
Long story short, sort of. In smaller sizes, it's hard to come by unpadded bras that aren't too deep for most people. However, with unpadded bras you can get away with a deeper cut and get a rounder shape with less digging in (I don't know why, if someone has a theory about this phenomenon I'd love to here it). So in smaller sizes, unpadded bras are generally deeper, but the same is true in larger sizes. Unfortunately however, this manifests itself differently since there are different typical shapes in each size range.
The Marcie does tend to work well on smaller breasts if you're looking at that particular one. If not that one, I'd inquire about your specific model and brand here and see if anyone has any experience with it. If no one has experience with it, I'd find a site with a good return exchange policy if you want it that badly.
Hm, maybe it has to do with cup depth vs. actual breast root depth/width? Like, from one side of my root to the other over my apex is between 8 and 8.25 inches, but I fit best into a cup with about 5 inches width and 7.5 inches depth. So does that mean I should look for unpadded that is closer to my actual breast size? Of should I go down a cup or 2 and find unpadded that still has about a 7.5 inch depth?
This thread has 3 comments. Log in to read them