| Measurement | Cm |
|---|---|
| Search by measurements | |
| Fits ribcage | 74.1 |
| B. perimeter | 25.0 |
| Stretched Band | 73.5 |
| Band Length | 61.2 |
| Cup width | 13.3 |
| Cup depth | 24.7 |
| Wire length | 23.0 |
| Cup height | 0.0 |
| Cup separation | 2.1 |
| Gore height | 6.8 |
| Wing height | 8.5 |
| Strap width | 1.4 |
| Hooks | 2 |
Loading 
Technically it fits, but the lacy part sticks away from my boobs yet again, like in 32F - Lulu Tout » Fleur Rose Underwired Bra (dd-h) (133523), the band has only two hooks (gasp) and the colou is much darker than on the website. Off to return it goes.
This bra is not owned any more
Updated on Sep 13, 2016 Flag this
I know right? Fleur Rose was my dream bra and the free-flowing lace destroyed her for me.
Hasn't set fit
Didn't write a review
Added on Sep 16, 2014
Figleaves has GOT to stop with this unattached lace layer garbage on their house brands. It's killed Lulu Tout for me. I'd literally buy at least 5 of LTs bras because they're gorgeous, tight in the band, narrow wired, projected - everything I need. But I cannot stand the outer layer of the cup not being attached to the inner layer. I even attached the two layers together in my Fleur Rose and it still didn't look right.