Share your bras and experiences and help other women
Get recommendations, write review and learn more!

Got bras? Create an account

Bra » Ewa Michalak » S Beżuś (667) » 65GG » Bras » Owner

Measurements

Measurement Cm
Search by measurements
Fits ribcage0.0
B. perimeter0.0
Stretched Band76.2
Band Length53.3
Stretch ratio1.4
Cup width14.6
Cup depth27.1
Depth ratio1.9
Wire length29.2
Cup height18.4
Cup separation1.3
Gore height8.3
Wing height11.4
Strap width1.9
Hooks3
Compare to your bras

Labeled as

Index30:10
EU65GG

Review

0
like

Hasn't set fit

B. perimeter 9
Stretched Band 30.0
Band Length 21.0
Stretch ratio 1.4
Cup width 5.75
Cup depth 10.65
Depth ratio 1.9
Wire length 11.5
Cup height 7.25
Cup separation 0.5
Gore height 3.25
Wing height 4.5
Strap width 0.75
Strap length 13.75
Hooks 3

After wearing the wonderfully light & spacious Comexim De Nuit with great success these last few months (despite cups not being quite wide enough for continually expanding breasts), bringing S Bezus into play has made it clear this is the superior shape for depth after removing the cookies. Somehow I'd forgotten about those, and felt the S cut too stiff, tall and while clearly a fuller shape, unable to allow space for my equally resistant breasts. Luckily, minor tinkering to adjust height brought it around, & is now my favorite between the 2 designs. I suspect that the cause of this fit difference is to do with the outer panel being very minimal in the armscye, and quickly expands to a marvelous level of depth before reaching the center cup seam.
The projection ratio used in this pattern is way stronger than in the SF, BM, HM, CHP or PL (listed in order from most projected to generally full), and GRRL! IT WORKS. While I do prefer the horizontal evenness in the De Nuit, it's not nearly as curvy in it's cut and suffers from my tough titties fighting back for breathing room. .
(Hint for those who haven't heard my eternal bitching: for not being 'projected', my breasts require an obscene amount of projection at the wire and at all areas in the cup- something 'shallow' & often conical cup shapes fail miserably at providing- even professional bra patterns are horridly flat & I tire of adding depth in depth in yet more depth into the lower cup for a basic not even good fit :/ )

While this cut has typically been a bad match for anyone picking between their projection needs & short breasts/roots height, it's absolutely amazing for depth if one can put it on inside out, and mark out a short 'fisheye' dart at bottom center of cup to tack the difference in height down (one might try this just below the upper band in cup but bulk weirdness seems like it wouldn't be worth it)

Updated on Mar 14, 2022 Flag this


Subscribe to updates on this entry


add a comment

Use @ to mention users, brands, models and more

You need to sign in to comment