I ordered this bra and the matching thong through MagdaBras4you 's first EM group order. It arrived today and I could not be happier about it. The shipping to Canada was very fast and Magda provides exceptional service. I will be ordering all my EM bras through Magda in the future.

This set is stunning - the red lace is VIBRANT and perfect for Valentine's day. It is definitely a date-night bra and one that I would have hidden in the back of my drawer in high-school. Although I have never owned a red bra before I am confident that this won't be my last. I didn't think that red would be complementary to my Canadian ghost-like complexion, but am pleasantly surprised but how nice it looks on.

There isn't much information about this bra on bratabase currently. Which surprises me because it is a stunning, excellent fitting bra. In terms of size and fit, this bra is consistent with the other M bras I have tried in the same size. The cups are narrow and deep with exceptional immediate projection, the gore is low and unobtrusive, and the plunge cut is deep, but yet, somehow feels very secure. I love the shape profile this cut gives me. It is round, but not as round as the CHP, and maintains a naturalish, very upfront shape. I've added a close-up side profile photo to show this shape profile.

This is perhaps the most stunning bra I have ever had. The red lace is vibrant and delicate; the lace detailing on the cradle and band really make this bra look special. The findings on this bra as a very dark navy - as is the embroidery on the red lace - and the contrast is really lovely. In photos of the PL and S version of this bra the findings appear to be black, but I like the navy much better. I think it adds a little uniqueness to the bra.

The one detailed review of this bra currently on Bratabase is from 2016 and emphasized that the band of this bra runs very tight - perhaps up to two sizes. This detail is consistent with other older reviews of M bras that I have read. Given this, I was a bit nervous about what size I should order. I have a 27" inch underbust and prefer tight bands, but was worried that a 65 might be too tight for comfort. I am happy to report that I was wrong - the 65 band is absolutely perfect. In my opinion, it fits like a true 60 band. Based on the other M bras that I was tried, it seems like the bands in this model currently run one size small - but not two. The stretched measurement of the band on this bra are within a centimetre of the 2016 70D. Perhaps EM has changed the pattern for this model.

This bra is not owned any more

Updated on Feb 11, 2019 Flag this

• Show all comments (13)
• This is stunning on you!

• It is a gorgeous bra and looks amazing on you!

• I love this! It looks great on you and the detailing!

• 3

  I can not understand why this bra isn't more popular - it is so gorgeous!

• 3

  Because Ewa model photos often don't do the bra color and details justice. I have several bras that weren't "wow" to me until I saw them in person.

• 3

  MamaPagan I think you are precisely right. Some of the colours and texture of the lace are quite hard to capture - especially with a iphone camera. Also, your SF Arlekin is outrageously gorgeous, but the CHP on EM's site has never appealed to me.

• 1

  Wow, wow, woweeeeeee!! Va va va voom!!

  I just got my 65S Magnolia. Uploading pics now

• 1

  AprilGoulding I hope its a perfect fit. I love the Magnolia fabric

• Another beautiful one! Looks stunning on you! Love the colour.

• 1

  You look spectacular in it!😍

  Thank you for the kind words.🙂
  I am always ready to help. Will there be willing for the next group order?

• I love my PL Carmen which is like the sister to this one, only mine has black accents for sure. My band is definitely tighter because it is lace covered. Do you think that it’s a different shape from the PL? More uplifting or more forward projection?

• 1

  Calluna it's hard to say. I've only tried 1 PL (65FF) and it wasn't a great fit for me. The wires felt too wide, I had quadding and I didn't get a great shape. While the cup width measurements of the M are the same, or wider than the PL, it follows my shape much better and does not fit wide. While the M is more lowcut, I don't quad, and feel very secure. The M also (in my very limited data sample) seems like it has more immediate projection and apex projection. These things combined give me a better, rounded shape. But, again, this could just be that the PL I tried was a rogue cut or that my shape is a better match with the M. I would be very curious to know what others think about the cuts. Sonya I think you have tried both cuts, do you have any wisdom on the intricacies of the M vs. PL fit?

• Hmm.. The M bras I've tried were borderline too small when I got them, but I hopefully will have a better fitting one soon. They are pretty similar to the regular plunges, I think, but made for smaller frames. The biggest difference I noticed in fit (besides the tighter band) was the M has less coverage. As in your nipples are barely covered. And it has great immediate projection. I'm not sure if it has more than regular plunges, but it might.

---

add a comment

Use @ to mention users, brands, models and more

You need to sign in to comment