| Measurement | Cm |
|---|---|
| Search by measurements | |
| Fits ribcage | 0.0 |
| B. perimeter | 0.0 |
| Stretched Band | 81.3 |
| Band Length | 66.0 |
| Stretch ratio | 1.2 |
| Cup width | 18.4 |
| Cup depth | 35.6 |
| Depth ratio | 1.9 |
| Wire length | 40.0 |
| Cup height | 28.6 |
| Cup separation | 2.9 |
| Gore height | 10.8 |
| Wing height | 12.1 |
| Strap width | 2.7 |
| Hooks | 3 |
| Index | 32:15 |
|---|---|
| FR | 70K |
| US | 32K |
| UK | 32K |
Didn't fit
I knew Bravissimo bras tended to run a bit small and closed-on-top, but I've been wanting a bright red bra, and I like the lace pattern, so I decided to try this out when it went on sale. It is a very pretty bra in person, IMO. Unfortunately, this definitely seems to run at least 1 cup size smaller than Panache Jasmine (which fits me in 32K, though 32KK would probably be better if it came in that size). The cup is too shallow at the bottom and too closed on top due to the elastic band added to the top of the stretch lace. It's possible that the former would be fixed by a larger cup size, but I think it would still be too closed in larger size.
The quality seems good pretty good (similar level to Ewa Michalak), but not sturdy enough for very large cup sizes. Compared to Panache Jasmine (my best fitting bra) the elastic at the bottom of the band is narrower (meaning it's more likely to distort and dig in over time and will provide less even band tension), and the straps are too stretchy, so they would also likely fold under pressure over time.This bra is not owned any more
Updated on Mar 11, 2019 Flag this
Cups seem at least 1 size smaller than Panache Jasmine. Perhaps because of that, or perhaps because of the cut it is too shallow for me, and also the seam at the top makes the cup too closed on top.
