- Strap separation:
- Not a problem
- Top of the cup:
- Cuts into breast tissue (quad boob effect)
- Band fit:
- The back of the bra is not at the same level as the front (rides up)
Bra » Curvy Kate » Wild Plunge Bra (SG1701) » 34GG » Bras » Owner
Measurements
| Measurement | Cm |
|---|---|
| Search by measurements | |
| Fits ribcage | 0.0 |
| B. perimeter | 0.0 |
| Stretched Band | 96.5 |
| Band Length | 68.6 |
| Stretch ratio | 1.4 |
| Cup width | 18.5 |
| Cup depth | 27.2 |
| Depth ratio | 1.5 |
| Wire length | 31.1 |
| Cup height | 0.0 |
| Cup separation | 1.9 |
| Gore height | 5.4 |
| Wing height | 10.8 |
| Strap width | 1.3 |
| Hooks | 3 |
Labeled as
| Index | 34:10 |
|---|---|
| UK | 34GG |
Review
0
like
like
Didn't fit
Things I have learned from this bra:
1) I am not as shallow as I thought I was.
2) Cleavage is awesome.
First, the band -- It is quite stretchy. So much so that I think it would be worth sizing down a band size (and almost certainly ordering the smaller band if one is in between). As I wore this bra during a not-too-active day, it wasn't much of a problem. But it definitely would have moved around if I'd worn it on a typical work day.
The cups -- Very definite wide and shallow shape going on. I appreciate that the wires are wide enough for me, even though I quad out of the cups. ("Quad" can be a verb now, right?) The material along the inside edge of the cup is soft enough that the quad boob doesn't feel uncomfortable.
I'm not sure if the cup runs a bit small in addition to the shape issue, or if the shape issue accounts for all of my difficulties. I fill out the outside half of the cup just about perfectly -- so if I sized up in the cup, I wouldn't spill over inside, but I would have gapping outside. (So either way, I think shape is *enough* of an issue to make a 34H/32HH not really worth seeking out to try.)
Updated on Jul 14, 2013 Flag this
