Comparing a 28HH Cleo Marcie Balconnet Bra (6831) with a 28J Panache Tango Ii Balconnet Bra (3251)
Summary
The band is pretty much the same in both bras. The 28J bra has bigger cups.
Sizing
The 28HH is 1 cup smaller than the 28J.
|
|
|
|
28HH 28:12 Cleo Marcie Balconnet Bra (6831) |
28J 28:13 Panache Tango Ii Balconnet Bra (3251) |
|
| Fits ribcage | ||
|---|---|---|
| 71.3 | 75.0 (+3.7cm) | |
| Breast perimeter | ||
| 32.6 (+32.6cm) | 0.0 | |
| Band length | ||
| 58.5 | 59.5 (+1.1cm) | |
| Stretched band | ||
| 74.3 (+2.1cm) | 72.1 | |
| Cup width | ||
| 15.0 | 16.5 (+1.5cm) | |
| Cup depth | ||
| 32.4 | 33.7 (+1.2cm) | |
| Wire length | ||
| 31.9 | 35.9 (+4.0cm) | |
| Cup height | ||
| 0.0 | 24.0 (+24.0cm) | |
| Gore height | ||
| 9.1 | 10.6 (+1.6cm) | |
| Wing height | ||
| 11.0 | 13.1 (+2.1cm) | |
| Strap width | ||
| 1.9 (+0.2cm) | 1.7 | |
| Cup separation | ||
| 2.2 (+0.2cm) | 2.0 | |
| Hooks | ||
| 2 | 3 | |
| Total bras | ||
| 20 | 8 | |
People who have both bras say:
-
0
likesWhile the cup depth might match up I experienced that the cups on the Tango felt waaaaay smaller. The wires are so awfully wide that they end where my sides go over to my back and the cup depth is spread over that area, which essentially makes the cups very very very shallow. The wires of the Tango also go very high. I had issues with them poking me in a 28GG back then, and a 28J, not a chance!
The Marcie on the other hand has wires on the narrower side for this size segment which does not run high under the arm. The cups are foward facing and projected with plenty of depth. Far far better.
Updated on Apr 10, 2014
-
Hasn't written a review yet
Link to this