| Measurement | Cm |
|---|---|
| Search by measurements | |
| Fits ribcage | 73.0 |
| B. perimeter | 23.5 |
| Stretched Band | 76.0 |
| Band Length | 59.4 |
| Cup width | 13.1 |
| Cup depth | 21.8 |
| Wire length | 23.3 |
| Cup height | 13.9 |
| Cup separation | 1.4 |
| Gore height | 6.8 |
| Wing height | 9.5 |
| Strap width | 1.5 |
| Hooks | 2 |
Loading 
Didn't fit
Beautiful bra the stock photos don't do it any justice, the lace blends with the mesh much more nicely than it appears in photos. I ordered a 70F based on the fit of another unlined 3HC, and this one is too small. It does have an overlapping gore which I didn't request. I also ordered in a balcony/plunge style in a 70F and it's a better fit.
https://mythoughtsonbras.blogspot.com/2016/07/comexim-angel-unlined-balcony-v...
This bra is not owned any more
Updated on Aug 03, 2016 Flag this
Beautiful!! Ggod to know the 3HC may be smaller than the balcony. Thank you for sharing your results!
Didn't fit
In my regular Comexim size of 70F, I get quadboob and a floating gore when I put it on. I have medium projected boobs with even fulness and tall roots, so I rarely get these issues.
Angel is very different from its cut sibling Comexim Coco (381). Maybe that's due to the fabric used. Angel is made of sturdy power mesh that has no give to it in contrast to stretchy lace of Coco.
I get a minimized profile in both, but Coco fits on the larger side, while Angel is way too small and quads all over. Same size, same cut. Bras are weird!
(amandafire noted in her review that it's rather closed on top as well, so maybe that's another issue I'm having here, as I have upper fulness and tall roots.)
Apart from that, it's stunningly beautiful and it's great for 'cakes on a plate' cleavage.
If you're FoB/short-rooted to even and enjoy unpadded halfcup styles, try it.
This bra is not owned any more
Updated on Dec 06, 2016 Flag this
Didn't write a review
This bra is not owned any more
Added on Feb 07, 2017
Too bad it didn't fit as it turned out lovely .