The Arquette seems to have been designed with a FOT shape in mind, while I am even, so it is not a completely perfect fit for me, but it’s still good enough that I kept it and have been wearing it without issues. The only slight shape mismatches are, firstly, the fact that apex of the bra is lower than the apex of my breasts, leaving the tiniest amount of empty space below the nipple. Also, there is a slight indentation (and when I say slight, I mean it is not visible, but I can feel it when I run my fingers over the bottom of the cups) ... which runs from the lowest point of each cup diagonally up and outward for an inch or so. I suspect this is due to lack of bottom projection. As I said, it still works well enough for me, but probably wouldn’t for those who need lots of projection near the underwires.

I wear some Masquerade models such as the Delphi, Persia and Rosetti in 28E, while this one fits in 28F, so I would say it runs slightly smaller and/or shallower than those (it’s not a shallow bra, however, otherwise it wouldn’t fit me in any size). It seems to be evenly balanced between center and outer fullness. The wires are exactly the same width as every other Masquerade bra I have tried in 28F. The band is firm like most Masquerade bands, but not quite as tight as the Persia, Orla or Delphi.

I love the aesthetics of this bra, both the unusual navy and white color combination, and the eyecatching geometric embroidery. Very happy that it fits me!
Read more
168 more words

Updated on Apr 19, 2015 Flag this