| Measurement | Cm |
|---|---|
| Search by measurements | |
| Fits ribcage | 68.5 |
| B. perimeter | 0.0 |
| Stretched Band | 71.1 |
| Band Length | 55.7 |
| Cup width | 14.6 |
| Cup depth | 27.6 |
| Wire length | 27.4 |
| Cup height | 18.5 |
| Cup separation | 1.7 |
| Gore height | 8.5 |
| Wing height | 11.4 |
| Strap width | 0.0 |
| Hooks | 0 |
Loading 
Didn't fit
My swimsuit from July/August. (Many cup sizes back) The cup are stretchy, (can fudge an extra cup size, especially if you have short roots) and the band is firm. No immediate projection what so ever. Loved it when it fit. I literally cannot see the edge of the cup looking down - all boobs! Believe it or not - I have short roots!
Edit: forgot to mention that my boobs are currently at their smallest!!! (Yay period)
This bra is not owned any more
Updated on Oct 28, 2018 Flag this
wendybien I think I could go up 3 cups to my current unpadded size, and still get plenty of cleavage. It used to slide down a lot, but now literally the whole cup is under my boob. 😂 (somewhat shelf-like)
Porn boobs! LOL, I love it, haha!
In defense of the bra, no males would be complaining about the fit at the beach. HeeHeeHee.
Thank you for sharing it. I can't wait until you get your tape measure & we can have more measurements on the site for our range. :-D
:-D. :-) :-o. :-[ .......The realization that you look like this in at least one bra that is classified as a fit....and that @wendybien's comment may have actually been about you......
https://www.bratabase.com/bra/dixl7/pictures/
Haha! Oh........ ;-)
MamaPagan hahaha nope, not you... try again! (This one appears to be a standard good fit without the cookies--no?) Clue--I'm talking about some folks who have not posted in a long time (that I know about, at least). I don't know as you would have taken much notice of their posts or reviews even if you spent a long time checking out entries here because all of them were significantly smaller than you in the cups. They all seemed to know each other and posted quite a bit on social media (and sometimes here) re: Polish bras, exclusively in the very lowest-coverage styles. They weren't clueless, they were just assertively enthusiastic about the busting-out-of-cups look, especially in the earlier postings. Just goes to show that one person's fit fail is another one's fit ideal--whatever floats people's boats! I did wonder if they always managed to wear their bras that way all day long in real life, because for me at least that fit would wind up being uncomfortable. But by the same token I am sure they'd all think you or I are completely nuts (or completely nuns?!?) to want cups that actually contain more than 47.5% of each boob ;-)
Haha! Yep, the only photo with cookies is the one with the caption as to why I don't wear cookies. I am not sure of those members you mentioned, maybe they were before my time? I do search through multiple sizes, trying to see patterns in measurements and fit across the span, so it is possible I've come across them at some point. It really is a giant puzzle to me that I am obsessed with solving!
I think we've all (or most) have gone through out sexy phase where we want more exposure and less coverage for outward validity, but yeah, at this point in my life, more coverage is prefered (BM style woohoo!) and aside from a few bedroom items that collect dust in my drawer, haha, the sexier styles tend to get bypassed for sure.
But it's okay for others to want that look & we can live vicariously through their fun phase!
Uh yes that looks like it has become a tight squeeze! It is probably scooting down your ribcage as soon as it's on, as the boobs fight their way to a point where they can sort of be accommodated in depth. I cannot stand it when the apex of a bra is too low for me so for me it would be a goner, but there are DEFINITELY some EM-wearers out there who have stated in no uncertain terms they want their bras to fit exactly like this. That is prob why she makes at least some bras with such a shallow lower half.