Compare this bra
Search by measurements
|Strap width||1.7 |
The band could be a bit less stretchy, otherwise the bra is excellent. I butchered the straps since they are way too short, but I don't recognize that as a fitting issue as altering the straps is really easy and doable at home.
Updated on Jan 08, 2016 Flag this
I don't think I'll be able to wear this bra out in public; I'd be too busy feeling myself up and staring at my cleavage. Seriously, I did not know my boobs could look like this. This bra right here has made my bra journey of the past few months to find my correct size worth it.
After the *epic* failures of every padded half-cup bra I ever tried on (mostly Freyas), I was sure this bra wouldn't work, but for $23 USD, I figured this lightly used bra was worth a shot. Boy, am I ever glad I tried it. Yet again, I see no reason to ... buy a bra of a different brand ever again (besides Cleo Lucy (5851) and identically constructed cousins, like Panache Sienna (4471)). This lingerie designer is a genius.
I love the quality of this bra. The satin straps are a nice touch, and being only partially adjustable isn't a problem for me. The lace curls a little at the bottom, but I got it second-hand, so not surprising.
Name means "peacock's eye" in English.
Updated on Sep 05, 2013 Flag this
I love it! Pretty typical EM CH shape, except that the foam is pretty soft (compared to my CH Onyks), which is a bit more comfortable, but also a tiny bit less wa-wa-woom-shapey.
The straps are padded on the front, similar to Cleo Juna, which is awesome if you get problems with the straps in other CHs.
The band seems to run normal, but I got it used so I can't really say.
The fabric is shiny on the outside, but it has a cotton lining on the inside.
Updated on Feb 05, 2016 Flag this
Didn't write a review
Added on Aug 01, 2013