Share your bras and experiences and help other women
Get recommendations, write review and learn more!

Got bras? Create an account

Bra » Ewa Michalak » Pl Triumf (710) » 100H » Bras » Owner

Measurements

Measurement Cm
Search by measurements
Fits ribcage0.0
B. perimeter0.0
Stretched Band103.0
Band Length83.0
Stretch ratio1.2
Cup width17.0
Cup depth36.3
Depth ratio2.1
Wire length37.0
Cup height36.5
Cup separation2.7
Gore height12.0
Wing height14.0
Strap width2.5
Hooks3
Compare to your bras

Labeled as

Index44:11
EU100H

Review

1
like

Didn't fit

Ordering: I ordered from Levana Bratique online, and I can highly recommend them. I ordered a PL and a BM at the same time.

UK bra size: 40HH/40:12
This size: 100HH/44:11

Fit: Generally this bra was too tall and too small in the cup for my very short roots, long breasts, and extreme projection. The band was a perfect fit for me, stretching to about 42 inches, my loose rib cage measurement, which I like to have for comfort as I bend and sit. The PL cups were super narrow at 6.7 inches. In comparison the S cut in the same size was 7.1 inches and a little shallower. I know that common wisdom is that the Plunge is shallower and wider than the S cut but that was not borne out by my experience in this size. In comparison my Curvy Kate Cabaret Plunge, my best fitting plunge, measures 7.3 inches wide, so the PL is much much narrower than that.

The cups were too high for my small side, but if I used two cookies, conveniently provided in the cookie pockets at the bottom of the bra, I had fairly even breasts which hit at the right height, which makes sense to me as I have about 2 cup sizes difference between the small and large breast. This bra's depth was not enough. I usually take around an inch more depth, so I may have needed to go up at least another cup size. Because of the lack of projection and space, I had wrinkling and fold over at the bottom of the cup. However, the biggest problem was that this plunge had a very high gore, higher even than the S cut! Because of this the gore gaped terribly being pushed out by my center touching breasts because it was also too tall (I need a 4 inch high gore or lower). There was no quadding in this bra, probably because of the tall stiff cups, but my breasts were pushed back until there was a crease between my breast and my chest wall. This meant my breasts, which are long, were pushed back into a ball shape, but so tightly they were squished. This bra slid out of my IMF but not to the same degree as the S cut. I mainly attribute the slide to lack of projection and a non-tacking, destabilizingly high gore. If not for the lack of plunge in this bra, I might have considered ordering a 100HH and 100J to try the sizing on them.

Comfort: Besides the comfort issues related to fit (wires, tall wings, etc.) the fabrics and elastics used were very high quality and soft to the touch. Nothing itched or chafed. These were the most comfortable bras I’ve ever tried but for the fit issues.

Style: The look was very round, like a basketball, even more so than the Cleo Marcie, as the breasts were gathered to the chest. The fabrics were high quality, and everything was beautifully sewed and appealing. It had a beautiful tonal lace on top, which was quite elegant. My husband thought the lace on the PL was a little dowdy, but I liked it.

This bra is not owned any more

Updated on Aug 05, 2016 Flag this


Subscribe to updates on this entry


add a comment

Use @ to mention users, brands, models and more

You need to sign in to comment

Fit information

On Jun 2016 View measurements

Center gore placement:
Doesn't lie flat against sternum
Bottom of the cup:
Can't quite fill it
Top of the cup:
Cuts into breast tissue (quad boob effect)

This bra didn't fit her, but these did